Exclusive: FreeWheel Serving Almost 2 Billion Video Ads/Mo, MLB is Newest CustomerThursday, February 4, 2010, 09:07 AM ET posted by: Will Richmond FreeWheel is on a roll, now serving almost 2 billion video ads/month, doubling its volume just since November, 2009. In addition, the company has added Major League Baseball Advanced Media to its customer roster and began implementing ads during the fall playoff season. The MLB win comes on top of recently announced customers Turner Broadcasting System and VEVO. FreeWheel's co-CEO/co-founder Doug Knopper brought me up to speed on all the news late last week. Doug said that part of the increase in FreeWheel's volume is attributable to the additional customers that have come on board, but he's also very excited about the year-over-year growth in ad volume FreeWheel is FreeWheel is also benefiting from its specialization in helping content providers monetize their video on third-party sites (e.g. YouTube, AOL, MSN, Fancast, etc.). More and more content executives are realizing that sizable viewership opportunities exist by syndicating their video outside of their own properties. Doug said that every content company FreeWheel is now talking to is interested in some kind of syndication. Doug described 3 types of syndication he's seeing: (1) across a family of sister corporate sites, such as PGA.com providing CNN.com video, which are both owned by Turner; (2) between affiliated entities like local MLB teams providing video to the main MLB.com hub and (3) externally, to unaffiliated 3rd parties, such as WMG music providing videos to YouTube. Given all this syndication activity, I was interested to learn from Doug what percentage of the ads FreeWheel serves fall into each of these 3 buckets vs. what percentage are served on the customer's sites themselves. Doug said that FreeWheel is pulling those numbers together in a way that ensures its customers privacy and will get back to me when he has them. In addition to the above syndication activity, FreeWheel is seeing experimentation with delivering ads to mobile devices, convergence/CE players and Internet-enabled TVs. In all these cases, customized ad policies determine who sells what ad inventory and how revenue is shared and reported. Powering all of this has been part of FreeWheel's core mission from inception, making it a key player in what I've called the 'syndicated video economy." FreeWheel's growth echoes what I've been hearing lately from both video ad network executives and video content providers. They too are talking about rapidly rising volumes and improving monetization. As I wrote recently, I've been impressed lately by efforts to make video ads more engaging and provide a better ROI, a trend I see continuing. Taken together, while it's still relatively early days, online video advertising seems to be making great strides. What do you think? Post a comment now (no sign-in required) Categories: Advertising, Research, Sports Related Analyses: Related News: Tags: 3 Comments posted |
![]()
Our Sponsors |























Will, You should really check your facts before running stories like this. This 2bn ads figure is very far from the truth and its a shame you've just regurgitated figures handed over by a company's PR machine.
The real numbers go more like this: FreeWheel volume did double in December, thanks primarily to the launch of Vevo. However, we know that Vevo served approximately 400m video streams globally (a publicly available figure confirmed by YouTube/Google), with an advertising fill rate of around 40% of available inventory (i.e. approximately 160m ads served).
Since FreeWheel are claiming to have served an extra one billion ads in December, they are effectively claiming to have added six Vevo-sized customers in that one month. We all know this is totally impossible. To provide some perspective, according to ComScore, Microsoft served 451 million video streams in October, Fox Interactive served 446 million streams and Viacom served 407 million, and Hulu 856 million (ComScore data via AdAge). If one assumes that these sites all sell about 50% of their available video ad inventory (a very fair assumption), then FreeWheel is claiming the equivalent of adding the whole of Microsoft, Fox, Viacom and Hulu to their customer roster in just one month. Does that sound plausible?
The reason FreeWheel are resorting to such massive distortions of reality is that their historic "massaging" of the figures is now catching up with them. Their relative volume month-to-month is shown clearly by the independent data in Comscore and Quantcast to have doubled at the time of the launch of Vevo. Since they provided you with a highly dubious figure of 1bn in November, they realize that to remain credible they must distort their figures even further to show themselves at 2bn in December.
The fact is, that FreeWheel's actual numbers are now (post-Vevo launch) close to 1bn video streams per month across their customers, and about 400-500m video ad impressions delivered. These figures are still impressive, and FreeWheel is growing well, but their web of lies is catching up with them.
Will, if you would like to speak to me about these figures, please either let me know in the comments and I can reach out to you, but I think you should consider publishing another post officially retracting this one and insisting that you will call out those companies that provide you with spurious figures in future.
www.freewheel.tv
Therefore talking about a mix of video ads and banner ads is not a clear depiction of your monthly VIDEO impressions.