Posts for 'AnySource Media'

Remember "two great tastes that taste great together," the slogan from the classic Reese's ads featuring the mixing of peanut butter and chocolate? Recent developments suggest that independently produced/made-for-broadband video and Video-on-Demand could be another Reese's-like combination, bringing together two disparate worlds that have attracted loyal audiences in an offering that could have significant consumer appeal.

Consider, last week Multichannel News reported that Verizon plans to bring over 7 million broadband video clips from providers like blip.tv, Veoh and Dailymotion to its FiOS service, which users can browse with their set-top boxes. Also last week, AnySource Media, a software company that powers broadband-connected TVs, announced content deals with TheStreet.com, Break.com, Revision3 and Next New Networks, creating hundreds of "virtual VOD channels." And yesterday, Clearleap, a startup technology platform I recently profiled, announced its own deals with blip.tv, Revision3 and Next New Networks, providing content that cable operators can meld with their VOD offerings.

This push among made-for-broadband producers, technology companies and incumbent video service providers is not coincidental. While they each have their own motivations, their alignment could signal a winning proposition for viewers.

For the indie content producers, on-demand access on TVs augments their viewing experience and access to their programming. Given how difficult the environment has become for independents (Daisy had a good piece on this topic yesterday) on-demand access is a real differentiator. For cable operators and telcos, popular indie video gives them a targeted pitch to the tech-savvy, younger audiences who have become loyal fans of indie content. Down the road this group is probably most up-for-grabs for alternative "over-the-top" services, so focusing on defending them is smart. And for technology providers, a big market opportunity looms trying to connect the previously disparate worlds of broadband and VOD.

In fact, in a conversation I had last week with Braxton Jarratt, CEO/founder of Clearleap, he explained that cable operators get all this. They're looking for quality "mid-tail" video from broadband producers, including clips and short-form programs. The company's technology is currently feeding broadband video to a couple hundred thousand cable VOD homes, with a backlog of "double digit" markets pending deployment. Braxton has a lot of content deals on Clearleap's docket, creating a menu for its cable customers to pick and choose from to incorporate into their VOD offerings. Clearleap also offers an ad insertion platform, so indie video can be monetized, not just offered as a value add.

Meanwhile, VOD has long proven itself popular with viewers. Comcast recently announced it has delivered 11B views since it launched VOD. It has continued to augment its library and add more HD titles. While VOD hasn't really been a money-maker itself, it has become a strong part of the digital value proposition and a defensive move against other viewing alternatives. By incorporating popular broadband video into its VOD choices, its appeal is only strengthened.

While the tectonic plates of "convergence" continue to shift, examples of broadband video making its way to the TV continue to happen. TiVo has been at this for a while with its "TiVoCast" service, along with technology providers like ActiveVideo Networks and others. The likelihood for independently-produced broadband video and VOD to get together seems poised to increase.

What do you think? Post a comment now.

Summary:

What: Clearleap has introduced a new technology platform for distributing broadband video content directly to TVs and an accompanying ad management system.

For whom: Incumbent service providers (cable/telco) and new over-the-top entrants (device makers, aggregators, etc.), content providers and advertisers

Benefits: For service providers, a flexible, cost-effective system for offering broadband content to their subscribers with minimal technology integration; for content providers a scalable system for distributing content across multiple providers and platforms; for advertisers a new method of targeting on-demand audiences.

More innovation is coming to the ongoing quest to bring broadband content to TVs as Clearleap, an Atlanta-based startup, pulled back the curtain yesterday on its ambitious technology platform. Last fall, CEO/founder Braxton Jarratt gave me a glimpse into what the company was working on and yesterday he explained it more fully.

Clearleap aims to do multiple things with its "clear|flow" and "clear|profit" products. For incumbent video service providers (cable and telco operators) and new "over-the-top" entrants (device makers, aggregators, etc.), Clearleap enables delivery of broadband and other video to the TV including integrating with existing Video-on-Demand infrastructure when present; for content providers, it improves the process of distributing of content across multiple providers and platforms; and for both service providers and content providers it offers an ad management solution that allows flexible ad insertion and business rules for ads running with Clearleap-delivered video.

That's a mouthful, so to break it down a bit, here's my interpretation. First the delivery side. Obviously there's been a lot of discussion, particularly just since CES in January, of new entrants delivering broadband content to TVs, thereby presenting potential alternatives for consumers to "cut the cord" on existing cable and telco providers. One way for incumbent to combat this is for them to offer the best of the web (like TiVo has been doing with TiVoCast for a while now) in one seamless package delivered through the existing set-top box.

To date incumbents haven't pursued this strategy much though. Braxton attributes this intransigence to lack of adequate technology, than to lack of interest. Braxton says Clearleap has a couple of small deployments active and other announcements pending. The key to success is allowing the incumbents to control the process of what content they acquire and to present it in context with other VOD offerings. clear|flow ingests video from content partners into Clearleap's data centers, transcodes it and properly formats it for target devices, adds metadata and business rules and then enables service providers to subscribe to whatever content they want. The video is either served from Clearleap's data centers or pushed to an incumbent's own hosting facility.

On the other side of the coin, another goal of clear|flow is to become the glue that allows content providers who want to distribute across all these emerging platforms to do so with minimal work. Just upload your content, specify business rules and the service providers take it from there. Of course, there's a "chicken and egg" challenge here that content providers will only take an interest when there's sufficient distribution. Braxton recognizes this issue as well and said they've been encouraged by the willingness of certain "friendlies" to get involved, which he hopes will provide validation for others to come on board soon.

Last, but not least, clear|profit allows ad avails to be created and properly divided between the content providers and service providers according to specified rules. Ad management and insertion has of course been the Achilles heel for existing VOD systems, rendering today's VOD a largely revenue-free pursuit for most service providers. Cost-effectively solving the ad insertion process for VOD alone would be a major win.

Last month's CES brought a wave of news from TV manufacturers about plans to integrate broadband access directly into their new sets. There's going to be growing momentum around this capability and I believe it's inevitable that broadband connectivity will one day be a standard feature in virtually all HDTVs.

The wrinkle in this scenario is that for broadband video on TV to be a compelling experience for consumers there must be a user-friendly environment to discover and navigate to desired video. Simply offering an Ethernet jack or wireless connection is insufficient. In fact a strong UI becomes even more important as video choices expand.

Seeking to solve the problem of how to organize, present and deliver broadband video via connected TVs is an early-stage company called AnySource Media that I believe is going to be getting a lot of attention over the next couple of years. I saw a demo of their service last fall and recently I talked to Mike Harris, AnySource's CEO to learn more.

The first and most important thing to know about AnySource is that its executive team has deep and successful roots in the consumer electronics (CE), video processing and semiconductor industries. As a result, it has the relationships, technical understanding and subtle know-how to get things done with the opaque CE industry. For example, a key question for me with the new crop of connected TVs has been whether new, specialized chips would be required in the TVs. These would inevitably cause upward retail price pressure, thereby suppressing consumer demand. Mike was able to walk me through the specific capabilities of chipsets commonly found in digital set-top boxes, how they are already migrating into TVs and how AnySource intends to leverage them to avoid creating new costs for the manufacturers.

There are two pieces to the AnySource Internet Video Navigator (IVN) solution: a software client freely embedded into the TV's chipset, and a back-end data center that aggregates and streams/downloads the content, creates metadata, organizes the presentation experience and passes on relevant advertising or commerce information.

AnySource's goal is not to disrupt the underlying content provider's experience or require any new encoding; it simply passes through whatever the content provider wants to make available. At CES it demo'd with 80 content providers and Mike said over 200 deals are in the works. Given the simplicity of its pitch, I think that as AnySource's footprint expands content providers will be very interested partners. AnySource doesn't plan to obtain revenue shares from content providers, rather its business model is to sell its own ads in the presentation screens.

The key to AnySource's model is of course is getting TV manufacturers to embed the IVN software. Mike was reluctant to get into specifics, but at CES AnySource demo'd on a Sylvania set from Funai. The goal is be in the market with at least 2-3 TV brands in '09 with more in '10. Obviously if AnySource's model gets traction, further deals will become a lot easier to get done. Unlike other devices which require new remotes or keyboards, AnySource-powered content will be available using the TV's remote control.

The connected TV space is the most exciting frontier in the broadband video landscape because it holds the potential to unlock vast new value for consumers and content providers. We've started to see some traction from third party devices like Xbox, TiVo, Roku, etc, but long-term the market will only achieve ubiquity when TVs themselves come with user-friendly broadband access. It's a highly disruptive scenario, and one which AnySource could well be a central player in.

What do you think? Post a comment now.